Skip to main content
The Agency.
Back to blog
AI CodingModel SelectionCost

GPT-5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.7: SMB Coding Team Guide

The practical decision is not "which model is universally better." It is "which model fits your workload economics and quality threshold." In many teams, routing both models gives better outcomes than forcing one model everywhere.

Ask AI about this article:

Listen to this article as an audio file:

Loading audio…

The headline metric

Token efficiency gap on equivalent coding tasks

72% fewer output tokens

When your workflow runs multi-step agent loops, this compounds into speed and cost differences.

Cost table at different scales

Daily coding agent volumeGPT-5.5 estimateOpus 4.7 estimate
Small (50 tasks/day)$40-80$140-280
Medium (500 tasks/day)$400-800$1,400-2,800
Large (5,000 tasks/day)$4,000-8,000$14,000-28,000

Illustrative values from the source comparison article.

Decision chart: who should use what?

Prefer GPT-5.5 when

  • Task volume is high and cost control matters
  • Work is discrete: bug fixes, tests, small features
  • Latency and throughput matter daily

Prefer Opus 4.7 when

  • Tasks require deep multi-file reasoning
  • Explanation quality is part of deliverable
  • Quality on ambiguous tasks beats speed

Original source and references

Need a Multi-Model Coding Workflow?

We design agent workflows that route tasks across models for better quality-to-cost performance.

Book Your Consultation